Stil eropuit
The Netherlands Beneath Your Feet
Back to map

Almost forgotten

Petrus Church and Old Sloterdijk

Between railways, motorway, offices and high-rise buildings, an unexpected remnant of the old village of Sloterdijk survives around the Petrus Church. Church, churchyard, dike and a few houses form a historic island in the modern city. The place is small, but the contrast is powerful: here you sense how a medieval village core was almost swallowed up and yet survived.

Almost forgottenSacred & quiet placesOld church sitePlace
The Petrus Church in Old Sloterdijk, between old village buildings and the modern city
The Petrus Church in Old Sloterdijk. Around the church, a small part of the old village survived among roads, railway lines and offices.Photo: Willem Reinier de Jong / Nederland Onder Je VoetenChanges: No changes.

Why go here?

Old Sloterdijk shows how a village can almost disappear without vanishing completely. The Petrus Church, churchyard and a few houses are hemmed in by infrastructure and high-rise buildings, yet still preserve the scale of a village along the old dike.

What do you see?

You see the Petrus Church on the Spaarndammerdijk, with its churchyard, old funerary monuments, several village houses and the remains of a historic village core. Around it lie roads, railway lines, offices and modern development. That collision is what gives the place its force.

Why it matters

The Petrus Church and Old Sloterdijk preserve a rare piece of village Amsterdam. Infrastructure and urban development almost erased the core, but church, churchyard and long-standing burial rights helped preserve the remnant. Here, the dead almost literally protected a vanished village.

The deeper story

Old Sloterdijk is a rare survival of an old village core within modern Amsterdam. Around the Petrus Church, the church, churchyard, several houses and the old dike structure remained in place, while the surroundings were radically changed by railways, roads, offices and high-rise buildings. The result is not a reconstructed historical setting, but the remnant of a village largely enclosed by the twentieth-century city.

The origins of Sloterdijk lie in the medieval landscape of water, peat and dikes. The Spaarndammerdijk protected the low land from the still-open IJ. Around the Slooterdam, traffic, trade and settlement developed. Its position on a dike and route gave the village significance: Sloterdijk was connected with water management, agriculture, fishing, transport and the routes between Amsterdam, Haarlem and the surrounding land.

In the fifteenth century, Sloterdijk gained a church dedicated to Saint Peter. The village core thereby received an ecclesiastical centre as well. The church functioned as a place of worship, landmark, gathering place and symbol of community. It was not separate from the landscape, but part of a small world in which water, dike, dam, fishing and village life were connected.

The present Petrus Church is largely seventeenth-century, but the church site itself is older. The building therefore carries a layered history: medieval origins, later damage, Protestant rebuilding and twentieth-century restoration. The visible church is not only an architectural object, but also the remnant of an older religious and village-historical structure.

During the Dutch Revolt against Spain, Sloterdijk was hit hard. In 1572, the Catholic church was damaged or destroyed by fire amid the violence of that period. The precise course of events is not described in the same way everywhere, but it is clear that the village formed part of the religious and political tensions of the sixteenth century. The church history of Sloterdijk is therefore also a history of war, religious conflict and change.

After the Alteration of Amsterdam in 1578, church life returned in Protestant form. The Saint Petrus Church became the Petrus Church. That transition changed both the use and the meaning of the building. A Catholic village church became part of Protestant Holland. The old church site remained, but was absorbed into a new religious order.

Recovery after the sixteenth-century damage was gradual. The church remained vulnerable and was largely renewed in the seventeenth century. Around 1664 it gained the sober form still recognisable today: a Protestant hall church with older parts in and around the tower. The simplicity of the building reflects the function of a village church after the Reformation: not a grand urban gesture, but a plain place for gathering and worship.

The landscape around Sloterdijk changed as well. The construction of the Haarlemmertrekvaart in the seventeenth century strengthened the connection between Amsterdam and Haarlem. Travellers, goods and the dead could be transported along this route. Sloterdijk was therefore not isolated, but lay on an important traffic artery. At the same time, the old water landscape changed through reclamation, road construction, railways and urban growth.

The churchyard around the Petrus Church forms a second important layer. It was not only villagers who were buried here. Because of lack of space in Amsterdam and changing burial customs, city dwellers also found a resting place outside the city. The Haarlemmertrekvaart made transport toward Sloterdijk possible. In this way, city and village, water and death, became connected.

The gravestones and funerary monuments around the church refer to that broader burial culture. The churchyard is more than a simple village burial ground. It preserves memories of Amsterdam families, older burial rights and a period in which burial outside the crowded city became increasingly important. The dead of Amsterdam received a place at the edge of old Sloterdijk.

In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Amsterdam moved ever closer. Industry, railways, roads and urban expansion transformed the area profoundly. Sloterdijk was annexed by Amsterdam in 1921. The village thereby lost its independent position. The name remained, but increasingly acquired a new meaning: station, railway lines, offices, motorway and business district.

The old village core came under heavy pressure in the twentieth century. The Petrus Church was closed in 1968 and the surroundings fell into decline. In the 1960s and 1970s, Old Sloterdijk was threatened by demolition and large-scale plans. The nickname ‘Sloperdijk’ sharply captures that period. The historical remnant was seen as inconvenient in an area increasingly organised around infrastructure, offices and harbour development.

That the Petrus Church, churchyard and several houses survived was not self-evident. The foundation for the preservation of the Petrus Church and the surroundings of Old Sloterdijk campaigned for the protection of the church and village remnant. Burial rights in the churchyard also played an important role. Graves could not simply be removed. The presence of the dead therefore offered unexpected protection against the complete erasure of the old core.

This history gives Old Sloterdijk a special weight. The remnant was preserved not only through age or monumental value, but also through memory, legal rights and local persistence. Church, churchyard and houses together form a historical core whose preservation was partly determined by residents, foundations and existing burial rights. The village core survived because it could not easily be removed from the landscape or from memory.

After years of uncertainty, restoration followed. The church came into the hands of the preservation foundation and was thoroughly restored between 1990 and 1992. Since then, the Petrus Church has again formed the recognisable centre of Old Sloterdijk. The building has been restored and well maintained, but its history is far from calm. It was founded, damaged, repaired, reformed, rebuilt, closed, threatened and saved.

Around the church, the contrast between old village scale and modern urban scale remains strong. The tower, churchyard, old houses and dike are hemmed in by roads, railway lines and large building volumes. Yet the remnant is not artificial. It is historical fabric that remained in its original place while the surroundings changed in meaning, scale and function.

The name Sloterdijk is now mostly associated with the station, railway lines, offices and motorway. Around the Petrus Church, an older layer of meaning lies beneath it: a village on the dike, connected with water management, church history, burial culture, urban expansion and demolition threat. That older layer is small, but still recognisable.

The Petrus Church and Old Sloterdijk therefore preserve a vulnerable piece of village Amsterdam. Between asphalt, rail and modern buildings, a core remained that recalls dikes, religious change, tow barges, burial rights and residents who did not want old Sloterdijk to disappear. The whole is not a grand monumental gesture, but a quiet historical core preserved against the pressure of the modern city.

Further reading